The Skripal affair and the Douma chemical attack - Killing three birds with two stones.
“The
people will believe what the media tells them they believe.”
George Orwell
Anyone
watching the alternate media space in recent weeks might be aware
that the Syrian Army has recently liberated Eastern Ghouta, a rebel
held stronghold near the capital Damascus which has been under
occupation since 2011. Large caches of chemical weapons were discovered
in the rebel held area, along with rockets and mortars, as well as
industrial-scale production of napalm and white phosphorous.
The
end of the six month operation in Ghouta is a milestone in the
liberation of Syria from rebel forces. Unsurprisingly little of this
has been reported by the Western press, who lacking any verifiable
first-hand evidence and without any correspondents in the war torn
country continue their nonsense narrative and cartoon-like depictions
of the evil doctor Assad; a monster who dismembers small children
with barrel bombs and gases his own people in a desperate and doomed
struggle to cling to power.
Last
week the insane clown President Donald J. Trump indulged his penchant
for delivering policy by tweet with the announcement that the US
would soon be withdrawing from Syria. This week the front pages are
ablaze with news of a new chemical attack in a “rebel-held”
northern area which according to ‘some humanitarian groups’ has
killed up to 100 civilians including children. In characteristic
fashion the verdict of the New York Times, the BBC, and CNN came
immediately; without investigation, without evidence, and without due
process: Assad has crossed the line and must be held accountable for
this war crime.
The
level of bastardy our political leaders and their presstitute wolf
pack will stoop to is beyond shameless. Damning allegations without a
shred of evidence are par for the course. Such is the case in the
fast-unraveling Skripal affair. Such is the case with the latest
events in Syria. Whether or not a false flag event was planned and
carried out by rebel forces in cooperation with their
Saudi/Israeli/etc sponsors is not even the point. The point, as
Jeremy Corbyn made clear in his speech to British Parliament
regarding the alleged Skripal poisoning, is that these are serious
allegations for which the evidence presented does not justify the
conclusion. Unsurprisingly, rather than being welcomed as a voice of
reason, Corbyn was scoffed at and labeled the “Kremlin’s useful
idiot.” Gee, where have I heard that before?
“There
is no alternative explanation” chortled Theresa May, summoning
Thatcher’s ghost. The evidence? The poisoning has been attributed
to a soviet era “novichok” nerve agent developed in top-secret
Russian laboratories at the end of the Cold War. An agent 8 times
more powerful than VX (which somehow failed to kill its victims.)
An agent which Porton Down, by its own admission, has access to. An
agent which any of eight former Soviet republics from Uzbekistan to
Ukraine may have had access to and motivation to use.
In
considering the overwhelming lack evidence it’s tempting to overlook
the sheer absurdity of the claim itself. In the world of
international intrigue it’s not uncommon to see important actors
mysteriously disappeared. Ambassadors, outspoken journalists, people
who know-too-much, perhaps dying from a skiing accident or a sudden
heart attack. But what kind of comic book assassin would commit such an
obvious crime as this, unless the purpose was self-incrimination?
The
two alleged chemical attacks may seem unrelated to the casual reader,
but the political and media response has been identical. For all its
high ideals of ‘freedom and ‘democracy’, our western so-called
liberal political framework is anything but free and democratic.
Author Richard Behan nails it when he writes: "Oligarchy is rule
by the few. Plutocracy is rule by the wealthy. Corporatocracy is a
society governed or controlled by corporations. We have all three."
The idea of a free and independent press is a fantasy. We live in an
era of total war, where information is weaponised. The fourth estate,
far from being a check on power, has become an instrument of
oppression. In such a climate we cannot rely on the dogmatic decrees
of corporate media (unless it concerns the extra-marital affairs of
politicians or other celebrity gossip, in which case we're pretty
safe.) Vigilance is required, the only rational course being to widen
our lens on current events while placing these in historical context
and asking pertinent questions.
For
instance: Who benefits from the Skripal affair? Certainly not Russia,
which has already faced a huge backlash from ‘the international
community’ resulting in the expulsion of diplomats and a level of
hostility not seen since the Cold War. Who benefits from the chemical attack in Douma? Certainly not Syria and its allies who would seem to
be on the cusp of final victory.
Yet
both incidents have been and will continue to be milked by the
corporate press to rally public opinion against Assad and the Syrian
government, against Russia and Putin, and against Jeremy Corbyn and
his labour-left platform. A veritable trifecta for our
neoconservative imperialist warlords, and a sad indictment on a
kool-aid addicted public all too eager to swallow the corporate media
swill.
Comments
Post a Comment